CCPR/C/GC/36
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
CCPR/C/USA/CO/4, para. 10.
European Court of Human Rights, Öneryildiz v. Turkey (application No. 48939/00), judgment of 30
November 2004, para. 71.
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Social and Economic Rights Centre (SERAC)
and Centre for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) v. Nigeria (communication No. 155/96), decision
of 27 October 2001, para. 67.
Inter-Agency Support Group on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues, “Lands, territories and resources”,
thematic paper towards the preparation of the 2014 World Conference on Indigenous Peoples, 22–23
September 2014, p. 4.
CCPR/C/KEN/CO/3, para. 9.
Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 6, para. 5; CCPR/C/79/Add.105, para. 12.
CCPR/CO/72/PRK, para. 12.
Toussaint v. Canada (CCPR/C/123/D/2348/2014), para. 11.3. See also CCPR/C/ISR/CO/4, para. 12.
CCPR/C/JAM/CO/3, para. 9.
CCPR/CO/71/UZB, para. 19.
Joint general recommendation No. 31 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against
Women/general comment No. 18 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child (2014) on harmful
practices, para. 56.
Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 6, para. 5; CCPR/C/COD/CO/3, para. 14.
CCPR/C/KGZ/CO/2, para. 13.
Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 31, paras. 15 and 19; Pestaño and Pestaño v.
Philippines (CCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007), para. 7.2; González v. Argentina
(CCPR/C/101/D/1458/2006), para. 9.4; CCPR/C/JAM/CO/3, para. 16. See also European Court of
Human Rights, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy, para. 51.
CCPR/C/ISR/CO/3, para. 12.
Sathasivam and Saraswathi v. Sri Lanka (CCPR/C/93/D/1436/2005), para. 6.4; Amirov v. Russian
Federation (CCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006), para. 11.2. See also Human Rights Committee, general
comment No. 31, paras. 16 and 18.
CCPR/C/AGO/CO/1, para. 14.
Marcellana and Gumanjoy v. Philippines (CCPR/C/94/D/1560/2007), para. 7.4.
E/CN.4/2006/53, para. 41.
A/HRC/26/36, para. 81.
Andreu v. Colombia (CCPR/C/55/D/563/1993), para. 8.2; Marcellana and Gumanjoy v. Philippines,
para. 7.2.
Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 31, para. 18; Inter-American Court of Human
Rights, Barrios Altos v. Peru, judgment of 14 March 2001, para. 43.
CCPR/C/CMR/CO/4, para. 15.
CCPR/C/BOL/CO/3, para. 15.
Novaković and Novaković v. Serbia (CCPR/C/100/D/1556/2007), para. 7.3; CCPR/C/RUS/CO/6 and
Corr.1, para. 14.
CCPR/C/MRT/CO/1, para. 13.
CCPR/C/GBR/CO/7, para. 8.
CCPR/C/ISR/CO/3, para. 9.
CCPR/C/GBR/CO/7, para. 8.
The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016) (United Nations
publication, Sales No. E.17.XIV.3), para. 10.
Camargo v. Colombia, para. 15.
The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), para. 25; InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, Kawas-Fernández v. Honduras, judgment of 3 April 2009, para.
102.
The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), para. 37.
A/HRC/14/24/Add.6, para. 93.
A/HRC/19/58/Rev.1, para. 59.
European Court of Human Rights, Oğur v. Turkey (application No. 21594/93), judgment of 20 May
1999, para. 92.
The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), para. 35.
Ibid., para. 13; European Court of Human Rights, Ramsahai and others v. Netherlands (application
No. 52391/99), judgment of 15 May 2007, para. 353 (requiring sufficient public scrutiny of inquiry
proceedings).
European Court of Human Rights, Tanrikulu v. Turkey (application No. 23763/94), judgment of 8
July 1999, para. 103.
CCPR/C/KEN/CO/3, para. 13.
Eshonov v. Uzbekistan (CCPR/C/99/D/1225/2003), para. 9.2; Zhumbaeva v. Kyrgyzstan, para. 8.8;
Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan (CCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013), para. 7.3.
17