Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty_A2602
Human Rights Violations- Violation Type
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty
- Legal Elements
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty: A public official was in some way responsible for, involved in, or consented to the arbitrary arrest
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty: An individual has been apprehended or taken into custody
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty: The arresting authorities did not invoke a legal basis for the arrest (procedural rights), namely: 1) The victim was not notified of the reasons for arrest and charges at the moment of the arrest and 2) The arresting authorities did not possess a valid arrest warrant
- Constituting Acts
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty: Arrest/detention based on guilt-by-association
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty: Denial of access to a judge or judicial officer
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty: Denial of prompt access to legal assistance
- Arbitrary Deprivation of Liberty: Lack of prompt notice of the charges
- Year of Violation
- 2017
- Location Where the Violation Occurred
- Affiliated Organisation
- Ministry of State Security
- Province Where the Violation Occurred
- Ryanggang
- Event
- Event1
- Date Range
- Aug 1, 2017 ~ Aug 31, 2017
- Responsible Perpetrator