CCPR/C/GC/36 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 CCPR/C/USA/CO/4, para. 10. European Court of Human Rights, Öneryildiz v. Turkey (application No. 48939/00), judgment of 30 November 2004, para. 71. African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Social and Economic Rights Centre (SERAC) and Centre for Economic and Social Rights (CESR) v. Nigeria (communication No. 155/96), decision of 27 October 2001, para. 67. Inter-Agency Support Group on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues, “Lands, territories and resources”, thematic paper towards the preparation of the 2014 World Conference on Indigenous Peoples, 22–23 September 2014, p. 4. CCPR/C/KEN/CO/3, para. 9. Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 6, para. 5; CCPR/C/79/Add.105, para. 12. CCPR/CO/72/PRK, para. 12. Toussaint v. Canada (CCPR/C/123/D/2348/2014), para. 11.3. See also CCPR/C/ISR/CO/4, para. 12. CCPR/C/JAM/CO/3, para. 9. CCPR/CO/71/UZB, para. 19. Joint general recommendation No. 31 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women/general comment No. 18 of the Committee on the Rights of the Child (2014) on harmful practices, para. 56. Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 6, para. 5; CCPR/C/COD/CO/3, para. 14. CCPR/C/KGZ/CO/2, para. 13. Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 31, paras. 15 and 19; Pestaño and Pestaño v. Philippines (CCPR/C/98/D/1619/2007), para. 7.2; González v. Argentina (CCPR/C/101/D/1458/2006), para. 9.4; CCPR/C/JAM/CO/3, para. 16. See also European Court of Human Rights, Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy, para. 51. CCPR/C/ISR/CO/3, para. 12. Sathasivam and Saraswathi v. Sri Lanka (CCPR/C/93/D/1436/2005), para. 6.4; Amirov v. Russian Federation (CCPR/C/95/D/1447/2006), para. 11.2. See also Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 31, paras. 16 and 18. CCPR/C/AGO/CO/1, para. 14. Marcellana and Gumanjoy v. Philippines (CCPR/C/94/D/1560/2007), para. 7.4. E/CN.4/2006/53, para. 41. A/HRC/26/36, para. 81. Andreu v. Colombia (CCPR/C/55/D/563/1993), para. 8.2; Marcellana and Gumanjoy v. Philippines, para. 7.2. Human Rights Committee, general comment No. 31, para. 18; Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Barrios Altos v. Peru, judgment of 14 March 2001, para. 43. CCPR/C/CMR/CO/4, para. 15. CCPR/C/BOL/CO/3, para. 15. Novaković and Novaković v. Serbia (CCPR/C/100/D/1556/2007), para. 7.3; CCPR/C/RUS/CO/6 and Corr.1, para. 14. CCPR/C/MRT/CO/1, para. 13. CCPR/C/GBR/CO/7, para. 8. CCPR/C/ISR/CO/3, para. 9. CCPR/C/GBR/CO/7, para. 8. The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016) (United Nations publication, Sales No. E.17.XIV.3), para. 10. Camargo v. Colombia, para. 15. The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), para. 25; InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, Kawas-Fernández v. Honduras, judgment of 3 April 2009, para. 102. The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), para. 37. A/HRC/14/24/Add.6, para. 93. A/HRC/19/58/Rev.1, para. 59. European Court of Human Rights, Oğur v. Turkey (application No. 21594/93), judgment of 20 May 1999, para. 92. The Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), para. 35. Ibid., para. 13; European Court of Human Rights, Ramsahai and others v. Netherlands (application No. 52391/99), judgment of 15 May 2007, para. 353 (requiring sufficient public scrutiny of inquiry proceedings). European Court of Human Rights, Tanrikulu v. Turkey (application No. 23763/94), judgment of 8 July 1999, para. 103. CCPR/C/KEN/CO/3, para. 13. Eshonov v. Uzbekistan (CCPR/C/99/D/1225/2003), para. 9.2; Zhumbaeva v. Kyrgyzstan, para. 8.8; Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan (CCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013), para. 7.3. 17